logo

When Winning Matters Most, Call Brad Laney.

Recent News

  • On November 6, 2018, in th...

  • – Bradford T. Laney,...

  • The U.S. Supreme Court rec...

© Bradford T. Laney

Call Now! 713-429-8056
Justice Kavanaugh's First Opinion

Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh’s First Opinion on the Bench

Whether you like him or not, Justice Kavanaugh is here to stay. On January 9, 2019, Kavanaugh wrote his first opinion on the bench. The case was Henry Schein Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc., Case No. 17-1272 (Appeal from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals).

Justice Kavanaugh’s first opinion was an easy one in the sense that the holding was reached unanimously by the entire Court (9-0).

The issue in this case whether the dispute in the underlying case was one that could and should have been sent to arbitration. At the heart of this issue was whether the arbitration agreement in this particular instance was broad enough to govern the dispute. The Supreme Court’s general rule on arbitration is that the parties have to show “clear and unmistakable” evidence that they agreed to delegate their dispute to an arbitrator.

In this case, the lower court found there was an exception to an arbitration agreement when a claim is “wholly groundless.” Justice Kavanaugh rejected the idea of such an exception and all the other Justices agreed. Justice Kavanaugh explained that Supreme Court precedent holds the“agreement to arbitrate a gateway issue is simply an additional … agreement the party seeking arbitration asks the federal court to enforce, and the [Federal Arbitration Act] operates on this additional arbitration agreement just as it does on any other.” Justice Kavanaugh then explained the Supreme Court’s usual rejection of the concept that a court should use a claim of frivolity as a basis for rejecting enforcement of an arbitration agreement, explaining that courts have “no business weighing the merits of the grievance,” because the “agreement is to submit all grievances to arbitration, not merely those which the court will deem meritorious.”

Whether or not you agree with the holding, Justice Kavanaugh’s first opinion was methodical in relying on prior Supreme Court precedent without trying to go “rogue” by creating new legal authority. This is in line with a Justice that takes his role of upholding prior laws seriously. Only the future will tell us if this streak continues.

Having a business litigation attorney on your site will help you understand the complexities of business law; having someone knowledgeable like Brad T. Laney on your site can make a big difference.

No Comments

Post a Comment